Aesthetic and surgical outcomes of the modified matrix rotation technique for upper inner quadrant breast tumors: a case series.

In patients with breast cancer, oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery can achieve a good aesthetic outcome without compromising oncological outcomes. However, tumors located in the upper inner quadrant (UIQ) are challenging for surgeons because treatment gives rise to visible scars, glandular deformities, and deviation of the nipple-areolar complex. The present study was performed to analyze a modification of the matrix rotation technique for UIQ tumors and address the main drawback of this technique, which is a visible scar on the commonly exposed part of the breast. A prospective database of seven patients who presented with UIQ tumors and underwent the new modification technique was utilized for the analysis. All patients preferred the modified technique over the standard technique because of the absence of a scar in the UIQ (visible breast line). The postoperative patient-reported outcomes regarding breast shape, breast symmetry, and scar location were also satisfactory. No surgical complications were reported. This modified surgical technique results in a scarless UIQ and is an aesthetically acceptable procedure that can be considered for UIQ tumors.

Volvulus of a wandering enlarged pelvic spleen involving pancreatic tail: A case report.

Splenic volvulus of wandering spleen is a rare clinical condition. It causes significant morbidity and mortality, especially if undetected. Here, we report a case of 32-year-old female who presented with worsening abdominal pain for 1-week duration. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan of the abdomen showed splenic volvulus with infarction and involvement of the pancreatic tail. She underwent exploratory laparotomy and splenectomy with preservation of the pancreatic tail. Patient progressed favourably. Our case report describes a rare clinical entity of a splenic volvulus with a twisted pancreatic tail. This is a life-threatening condition that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment.

Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery versus standard breast conserving surgery for early and locally advanced breast cancer: a retrospective analysis from Sri Lanka.

BACKGROUND: Breast aesthetics is becoming increasingly important in breast cancer surgery due to changes in patient expectations and greater emphasis been placed on the psychosocial outcomes. Studies have shown no difference in local recurrence risk between mastectomy and breast conserving surgery (BCS) and also a higher overall survival rate after BCS. Breast preservation improves the quality of life substantially compared to mastectomy. Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (O-BCS) involves tumour excision whilst overcoming the limitations of standard breast conserving surgery (S-BCS) by allowing larger resection volumes, avoiding deformities with better aesthetic results. Our study aims to compare the oncosurgical and aesthetic outcomes of O-BCS versus S-BCS among women in Sri Lanka. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study over a 4-year period including patients who underwent breast conservation surgery for primary non-metastatic breast cancer in two tertiary care units. We assessed outcomes in terms of re-excision rates, resection margin, complications and aesthetic outcomes using a Likert scale questionnaire to grade specific outcomes such as symmetry, volume, nipple position, scar visibility. Non-parametric tests were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Fifty-four and seventy-three patients underwent S-BCS and O-BCS respectively. The median specimen volume and the maximum tumour diameter were significantly higher in O-BCS [160(range:65-220); 4.2(range: 1.2-5.2)] compared to S-BCS [65(range:45-86); 2.4(range: 1.0-2.6)]. The median closest tumour margin was 16 mm (range:4-25 mm) in O-BCS while 6 mm (range:<1 - 12 mm) in S-BCS (p = 0.01). Close (< 1 mm) and positive margins needing re-excision were seen mostly in S-BCS. Superior aesthetic outcomes with statistical significant difference were reported in the O-BCS compared to S-BCS group with better symmetry, volume, nipple position and scar visibility. The re-excision rates were significantly lower in O-BCS group. There was no significant difference in the operative time and complications while the aesthetic outcomes were significantly superior in OBCS. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, Level 2 perforator flap based reconstruction had superior aesthetic outcomes. O-BCS is safe and more aesthetically acceptable with no difference in oncological outcome and operative time. More consideration should be given to aesthetic parameters such as scar visibility, nipple position, breast volume and shape when considering the best surgical option for the patients.

Medical students' perception and attitudes on operating theatre learning experience in Sri Lanka.

Objective: The operating room is a unique learning experience that has visual, aural, kinesthetic learning stimuli and provides benefits to the medical students such as development of sound clinical knowledge and skills, and gaining personal insight into ones' career choice. However, this can be a challenging place due to the unfamiliar learning environment. We aimed to study the Sri Lankan Medical students' perception and attitudes on operating theatre learning experience. Design and setting: A descriptive cross-sectional survey was carried out among medical students undergoing surgical clinical training on the perspectives of the teaching and learning experience in the operating theatre in Sri Lanka. Participants: Our study group consisted of 390 medical students from four different medical faculties in Sri Lanka representing all levels of surgical clinical rotations. Results: A majority of the students had actively participated in the operating theater. Despite this, the students' clarity of the learning outcomes and expectations in a theatre varied greatly. Majority of the students felt that the surgeons were willingly to teach but also noted that there was no standardization in teaching. This study clearly shows a significant correlation between positive emotions and surgical teams welcoming attitude towards the medical students. Long standing hours were considered a negative emotion by a majority of students. We also observed that theatre environment can be physically and mentally exhausting. Conclusions: Thus, empathy, feeling welcome and giving breaks to refresh can go a long way in making the learning experience better. Regular feedback to trainers on students' perception of the theatre experience is important to value the students' opinion and improve the quality of the surgical theatre. We strongly recommend initiation of clear induction sessions with introduction of well-structured teaching learning activities in the operating theatre.

Breast cancer in lactating mothers: A case series of delayed diagnosis.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Due to pregnancy related changes in the breast, a breast feeding mother as well as the health care professionals may attribute a change in the breast for lactation resulting in a delay in evaluation and diagnosis. We report a cases series of delayed diagnosis of breast cancer during lactation in three young patients from a developing country who had sought medical attention on time but was unfortunately diagnosed late. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report three breast feeding mothers aged 38-39 years presenting with breast lump and edema. All patients had an ultrasonography of breast performed at least once and the radiological findings were attributed to physiological changes initially despite non-resolving symptoms for 3-4 months. Triple assessment revealed invasive breast cancers of T4N1M0, T2N1M0, T3N2M1 staging. Two patients were treated with a curative intent and the patient with metastatic cancer was referred for palliative chemotherapy. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Lactational mastitis, breast abscesses, galactoceles, breast edema are benign conditions that are unique in lactation period, but it is important not to overlook that the lactating women may develop any of the other breast problems seen in the non-lactating female population. CONCLUSION: Our case series represent very similar scenarios of delayed or missed diagnosis of breast cancer in young lactating women. A lactating patient should be referred to a specialist center and/or a complete assessment of the breast should be performed in case of any red flags findings to avoid missing a sinister diagnosis.